There are probably 303 species of mammals left to be discovered by science, most of which are likely to live in tropical regions, according to a predictive model developed by a team of University of Georgia ecologists. Their research, recently published in Ecology and Evolution, could guide efforts to find and conserve these as-yet unknown species.
“With extinction rates increasing, it’s extremely important to be able to find new species before they disappear if we want to be able to understand the world that we’re living in,” said lead author Molly Fisher, a doctoral student in the Odum School of Ecology.
To determine the number of undiscovered mammal species, Fisher and her colleagues had to start by finding a way to estimate as accurately as possible the total number of mammal species, both known and unknown.
Because it is not logistically possible to count all the world’s species based on direct observation, scientists use statistical models to calculate their numbers. Fisher based her approach on one such model that was published in 2011 estimating the total number of plant species.
“We took their method and built onto it,” said Fisher. “We decided to work with mammals because they are a group that everyone knows, and we’re getting to that point where we actually have discovered a majority of them.”
Find your dream job in the space industry. Check our Space Job Board »
The model is based on the relationship between the number of species descriptions published and the number and efficiency of taxonomists—the scientists who describe and classify species—working at a given time.
Fisher pored through records of species descriptions of mammals from 1760 through 2010 and counted how many taxonomists were working and how many species descriptions were published in each five-year increment within that time.
“With this method, we can see the pattern of how many species are described and how that’s related to how many taxonomists are working in a time period,” she said.
To then predict the total number of species, they used a statistical technique known as maximum likelihood.
“Maximum likelihood estimation figures out how many species there are likely to have been to produce the pattern of description that we have seen,” she said.
Fisher’s model differs in two important ways from the one upon which it was based. She and her colleagues used a different method to calculate taxonomic efficiency that allows it to increase exponentially over time, thereby reflecting the effects of gains in scientific technique and knowledge. They also applied a different statistical distribution pattern that was better suited to the kind of data they were studying.
Using simulated data sets, the researchers ran thousands of tests of both models and found that theirs was more likely to arrive at the correct number of species. Running their model with the actual data yielded an estimate of 5,860 mammal species currently in existence—more than previously thought. They then subtracted the number of known mammal species to come up with the estimate of 303 yet to be discovered.
Their next step was to apply their model to species by geographic region, using species range maps from the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Their results predicted that the tropics contain the greatest number of species overall, including the most undiscovered species, and that the Palearctic region—consisting mainly of Eurasia—contains the highest percentage of undiscovered species.
“That was actually very interesting for me as well as for anyone else who’s looked at this,” said Fisher. “We expected that the tropics would have the most species because the tropics are the least well studied and have a lot of cryptic species.” Cryptic species are indistinguishable based solely on appearance, but can be differentiated using genetic analysis. “There may be more cryptic species in the tundra/taiga of the Palearctic than previously assumed or found,”she said.
University of Georgia
Molly A. Fisher et al. The description and number of undiscovered mammal species, Ecology and Evolution (2018). DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3724
Cooler (blue) colors represent regions with fewer undiscovered species, and warmer (red) colors represent regions with more undiscovered species
Credit: University of Georgia