Methane-producing microbes in California rocks



facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedintumblr
Methane-producing microbes in California rocks

The Cedars, shown here, is a small, isolated set of springs flowing out of a large patch of red rock from Earth’s mantle in Sonoma County, California. The Cedars is one of the few easily-accessible sites of serpentinization on land. Scientists report in a new study that they have found evidence of hardy, methane-producing microbes in water that surfaces from deep underground at The Cedars. Credit: Lukas Kohl

Deep in vents on the ocean floor, methane-producing microbes feed off chemical reactions between water and rock. Now evidence of this process has been found on land in a freshwater spring in California.

A team of scientists report in a new study that they have found evidence of hardy, methane-producing microbes in water that surfaces from deep underground at The Cedars, a set of freshwater springs in Sonoma County.

It is the first time scientists have proven that these kinds of methane-producing microbes, which thrive in harsh environments, live anywhere outside of the deep sea. The new finding could offer clues into how early microbes could have lived on Earth billions of years ago and if they might be present on other planets like Mars, according to scientists in the field.
 

 
The new study also shows the newly-discovered microbes are likely capable of using carbon dioxide to produce methane — a finding that could have implications for future carbon sequestration projects being proposed in areas similar to The Cedars, said Lukas Kohl, a biogeochemist at Memorial University of Newfoundland in St. John’s, Newfoundland and lead author of the new study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research — Biogeosciences, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

If the microbes convert carbon dioxide injected into the ground into methane — a potent greenhouse gas — it could offset the benefit gained by carbon sequestration, he said.

“As our technology’s expanding, we’re able to look outside of the box a little to capture some of these groups [of microbes],” said Matt Schrenk, a microbiologist at Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan, who was not involved in the study. “As we’re beginning to look into some of these natural environments [deep underground], our view of the microbial world, and of life in general, is really expanding.”

Serpentinization, a process where water reacts with rock to create a green stone called serpentine, is common on the ocean floor. In the process, byproducts of the reaction, including methane, hydrogen, and heat, are released. The Cedars–a small, isolated set of springs flowing out of a large patch of red rock from Earth’s mantle — is one of the few easily-accessible sites of serpentinization on land.

Communities of microbes have been detected at many serpentinization sites across the globe, including in oceanic vents and sites deep underground. These harsh, high-pH environments have few organic molecules for organisms to feed on. These hardy microbes likely use the byproducts of serpentinization as an energy source, according to the study’s authors. Until the new study, however, the only sites known to host microbes that released methane as a waste product were deep underwater, Schrenk said.

Previous analysis of water from The Cedars suggested some of the methane found in the springs could have come from microbes. To confirm the microbes could produce the methane at The Cedars, the study’s authors took water samples from the springs and exposed the samples to different conditions in the laboratory.

In one group of samples they killed any living microbes. In these samples, they did not detect any additional methane being produced.

The samples with live microbes, however, produced significant amounts of methane. In some cases, the live-microbe vials contained 650 percent more methane than vials with dead microbes. The scientists were also able to trace the methane, and determine that it had been produced by microbes, rather than as a product of serpentinization. The new study, combined with previous data, suggests a significant portion of methane in water at The Cedars likely comes from the microbes living there.

The new findings also suggest the microbes can convert carbon dioxide into methane. Some scientists have proposed injecting carbon dioxide from the air into rocks like those at The Cedars. The carbon dioxide interacts with the rock and water to form a solid carbonate that can sequester carbon underground indefinitely and keep it out of the air. But if the microbes convert the injected carbon dioxide to methane and release it into the atmosphere, it would defeat the purpose of sequestration, Schrenk said. “If some of that [sequestered] carbon dioxide is converted to an even more potent greenhouse gas, we’re really in trouble,” he said.

The new study also sheds light on how microbes could have used the energy and chemicals from serpentinization to survive on early Earth when the atmosphere contained less oxygen and fewer organic molecules, said William Brazelton, an astrobiologist at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City who was not involved with the study. Further, the methane they released could have had an impact on the environment and the Earth’s evolution, he added.

The discovery of the methane-producing microbes at The Cedars also gives hope to those searching for life on Mars, Brazelton said. Some surveys of the Martian atmosphere have found methane, which was thought to be a product of serpentinization. This study shows the methane could be a product of both serpentinization and microbes, Brazelton said.

 


Source: American Geophysical Union

Journal Reference:

  1. Lukas Kohl, Emily Cumming, Alison Cox, Amanda Rietze, Liam Morrissey, Susan Q. Lang, Andreas Richter, Shino Suzuki, Kenneth H. Nealson, Penny L. Morrill. Exploring the metabolic potential of microbial communities in ultra-basic, reducing springs at The Cedars, CA, USA: Experimental evidence of microbial methanogenesis and heterotrophic acetogenesis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2016; 121 (4): 1203 DOI: 10.1002/2015JG003233
Posted in Environment, Matter & Energy on May 25, 2016